T O P
ShakeN_blake

His lawyer needs to raise this issue tomorrow. Prove that the seated jury cannot be impartial. There is fuckery afoot…


King_Yautja

What exactly would proper representation look like? Wisconsin is 50% female (obviously) and about 6% black so this jury is about as close to representative (if you care about that sort of thing) as you could get.


mateodrw

LOL, How many trials you've followed? I could care less about how the jury is composed. You don’t pick a jury in one day in a high profile and heavy politized case like this. Extensive voir dire is extremely important. Chauvin — 2,3 weeks of voir dire (and still they were allegations of juror misconduct because one juror lied under voir dire) Arbery — 3 weeks of jury selection process. They were picking prospective jurors for 2 weeks. Zimmerman — 1 week of voir dire (and this was a 2013 case, when social wasn’t as popular as today and the country was much less divided)


King_Yautja

OK I take it when you said "representation" you meant *legal* representation? Due to the context in the headline I thought you meant the other kind of "representation", which I thought was an odd point to bring up. But yes I agree the demographic make up does not matter, and the speed at which jury selection was completed does raise an eyebrow.


mateodrw

Ok, my bad. Edited to clarify that i was talking about the LEGAL representation, and not the representation of the jury pool.


New_Train_649

Well not 11 women.


ShakeN_blake

Jack Poso says the jury is 11 woman, 9 men. https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1455350070350655491?s=20


MrFixemall

20 people are seated but the deciding 12 will not be picked till the end of the trial.


feelin_cute

Kyle is guilty and will be found guilty.


King_Yautja

Genuinely asking, what makes you come to that conclusion? I've seen all of the footage and honestly if that is not the most clear cut case of self defence in history, I don't know what is. So honestly curious to see how someone comes to the opposite conclusion.


Either-Arm-1687

He went looking for trouble and found it.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Either-Arm-1687

Keep telling yourself that. He brought an assault weapon. Not a .38


seymourrichardson

Assault weapons have been illegal since the passage of the Hughes amendment in 1986...


[deleted]

[удалено]


Either-Arm-1687

Jury knows what an assault weapon looks like and it’s not designed for self-defense.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Either-Arm-1687

Nuance. Jury won’t care. His intent was to inflict bodily harm. Mountains of evidence despite all the rhetoric. He had no authority, or responsibility to protect property he did not own or was a designated caretaker for. He’s going to jail for life. That’s a lot of dicks and salad tossing.


Candi_Fisher

You’re wrong. Prosecution said there is nothing wrong with defending someone else’s property. Watch the opening statement. [link](https://youtu.be/lNUnsKxRZpE)


3D_Arms

Ar-15 is arguably the best self defense firearm platform today.


donnie_one_term

He inserted himself into a dangerous situation, ready to kill, and thinking he was in his rights, because there were demonstrations. Pig face shot someone in the back. Pig face will spend may years in prison.


[deleted]

[удалено]


donnie_one_term

Pig face was being chased after he murdered someone. Is pig face your hero?


[deleted]

[удалено]


ArkariusZL1

Homeless child molester and spouse abuser is your hero?


seymourrichardson

So did the 3 dispatched threats... That's a moot point.


[deleted]

Tennessee V. Garner. Go home commie both incidents were justified. Edit: since for some reason your reply whining about being a commie was deleted look in the mirror.


Professional_Big_731

What I don’t understand is that he’s claiming self defense. Which means he was fearful of his life. But is it reasonable for him to deliberately put himself into a dangerous situation and then only when an unarmed man provoked him his response was to kill him? He was also there to render aid, yet didn’t help any of the men he shot. I don’t understand that. Kyle put himself in a dangerous situation. It was a protest. It’s reasonable to assume there could be violence. He didn’t need to be there, he made the decision knowing he wasn’t legally allowed to be there with a gun. The fact that his friend made the gun purchase says he knew.


King_Yautja

That's just a little to close to "she was asking for it" for my liking.


Either-Arm-1687

Did Kyle get a sex change?


donnie_one_term

Pig face is a soy boy incel, that larps with his big bad gun


[deleted]

Shoot *ME*, ni&&a!


donnie_one_term

You’re being censored by, yourself. Lol


[deleted]

I only say that word if I'm singing along with OutKast or at a Klan rally.


donnie_one_term

Woke


sanja_c

He went looking to put out fires and provide first aid to victims of the riot. He was *not* looking to get chased away, pursued, cornered, and violently assaulted by a group of pedo-Antifas - that was the pedo-Antifas' choice. Whether or not you approve of his being there (to put out fires and aid victims), is quite irrelevant - he had a right to self-defense after his pursuers cornered and attacked him.


feelin_cute

Administer first aid? How about some aid to the person he shot in the back, to death? I don’t believe he offered any aid to that **victim**


sanja_c

No, obviously he could not administer first aid after one of his attackers forced him to use self-defense, because the rest of his attackers kept pursuing him and so he had to keep running. Cleaning up graffiti, putting out fires, and administering first aid: That's the reason he was there, and that's what he did - *until* the Antifa mob started chasing and assaulting him, so he had top stop doing all that stuff and instead run away.


feelin_cute

Cleaning up graffiti with a giant, illegal gun around his neck … uh huh, sure!


sanja_c

Yes, for protection. Which is completely reasonable. Carrying a rifle in an open-carry state is not a provocation, nor does it remove the person's right to self-defense. And the legality of Kyle carrying a rifle at age 17 is disputed - the law is vague and poorly written.


feelin_cute

He didn’t have a permit for that gun. It was purchased for him illegally


King_Yautja

Good thing he had it though. The mob would have kicked him to death otherwise.


sanja_c

You don't *need* a permit to open carry in WI. What the prosecution is trying to use to pin a gun misdemeanor on Kyle, is a law that makes it illegal to carry a rifle under the age of 18 in some circumstances. But it's ambiguously worded as to what those circumstances are.


seymourrichardson

Please stop spreading debunked lies. Thanks!


NukeAllCommieTrash

Sounds like this applies more to the rioters, looters, and arsonists.


Intrepid-Client9449

Explain why it is ok for a pedophile to chase him because he was a minor


seymourrichardson

The only thing he's guilty of is acting in self defense, which isn't illegal. Quite the opposite, actually.


feelin_cute

…we shall see what the jury, and the letter of the law, has to say about that.


seymourrichardson

We all know what the letter of the law says, and that is that he acted in self defense... Full stop.


feelin_cute

LOL! *Full stop!* …that’s what he shoulda done on his murderous rampage


seymourrichardson

If it were a "murderous rampage" as you say, why did the only people who were dispatched the ones attacking him? If he were trying to kill people, he had an awful lot of them there he could have, instead of offering medical aid and only defending himself. It's adorable how you ignore the facts, that are documented on video, in favor of leftist propaganda. 😘


feelin_cute

The proof is in the videos. Everyone standing around, then here comes Kyle on a full on sprint toting a fire extinguisher and a dangerous unlawful assault rifle. He was clearly on 10, all hyped up- thinkin he was in a Call of Duty game… people were like, *”dude calm down*” and he shouts back and engages and shoots a bunch of people to death. He’s a terrorist in my book. **FULL STOP.**


seymourrichardson

He didn't have an illegal rifle, because "assault rifles" have been outlawed since may of 1986 with the passage of the Hughes amendment. It's impossible for him to have had an assault rifle. He ran towards arsonists who lit a dumpster on fire and pushed it towards a gas station, putting out their fire. The first pedo got mad and tried to chase him down and when he lunged at him, Kyle dispatched the threat, legally. Literally nothing you've said is true, please stop before you dig your hole too deep to get out. Kyle engaged 3 threats and nobody else, please stop lying. Thanks. Your book is fiction. **FULL STOP**


NukeAllCommieTrash

Stop simping for convicted pedos, you sick fuck.


feelin_cute

When you have to resort to name-calling your opposition “pedos” that’s a good queue that you’ve already lost the argument 🤷‍♀️😂😂


NukeAllCommieTrash

Probably because you're simping for [a literal dead pedo](https://archive.md/qmmrb#selection-1605.0-1605.22) that died doing what he loved; chasing children.


feelin_cute

The victim isn’t the focus on what’s up for judgement here, and Kyle’s duty was not to play god and decide who lives and who dies. You’re confusing who’s on trial, lol. Kyle is on trial. Kyle shot someone in the back, to death. Kyle is claiming self defense because he has no other plausible defense. But the reality is, he put himself there- he solicited a fight, and he escalated it. He will be held responsible.


NukeAllCommieTrash

But the pedo wasn't the victim, he was the aggressor, caught on camera charging at someone that was retreating. >Kyle shot someone in the back, to death. In the back? No, he was shot in the front while charging someone and it was caught on video, so fuck you and your reality-denial. Just because the first shot made him curl up so that one of the follow-up shots in the next 0.76 seconds happened to hit him in the back, doesn't mean shit. Keep trying to peddle this bull though, I'm sure people will believe your pathetic gaslighting attempt instead of video evidence and their own lying eyes.


feelin_cute

Oh ya- I forgot, he shot the victim many times, shooting the victim even after he “curled up” …*in self defense* … I think you’re proving my point even better than I was, thank you!


NukeAllCommieTrash

Again he didn't shoot a victim, he shot a perp that was charging him. Yeah he curled over between the 1st and 4th shot 0.76secs later, that's the whole point of firing multiple shots, to make sure you land a hit and that one of them is good enough to make the bad guy keel over in pain.


feelin_cute

The bad guy is on trial


NukeAllCommieTrash

The bad guy is dead. Trust a lefty to disagree that the convicted pedo was a bad guy.


ArkariusZL1

Good all of these fucking pedos should be curled up in a pile of their own blood. Defenders of pedos too, since obviously only pedos would defend pedos.


feelin_cute

Lol! Tell it to Matt Gaetz hun


ArkariusZL1

He should burn too.


lorelei81

Facts